More work needs to be done to educate ignorant CMA practitioners.įor a long time, the Chinese government banned the combative practice of CMA among the civilian population, instead only allowing the practice of Wushu Taolu (武术套路), i.e.While Sanda has foreign influence, saying Sanda isn't CMA is like saying Sambo isn't Russian.Almost every Sanda technique can be found in CMA.CMA practitioners have long dismissed Sanda as not being CMA.In the 1980s, China modernized Chinese Martial Arts (CMA) to create Sanda (translation: "free fighting"). "Ultimately, the biggest obstacle preventing Sanda from solving CMA's problems is CMA practitioners themselves: if even we don't own it as Chinese Martial Arts, why should anyone else?" Abstract: It turns out, that somewhere along the timeline of the development of Sanda (Chinese Kickboxing), even Chinese Kung Fu / Martial Arts practitioners stopped believing that it was Kung Fu themselves. Which begs the question, is Sanda actually a modern culmination of Chinese Martial Arts, or not? And even if Sanda truly came from Chinese Kung Fu - why does no one seem to know or believe this? Many people tend to believe this narrative - that Sanda ("Free Fighting" in Chinese) is simply a mashup of techniques 'stolen' from non-Chinese martial arts, and that Sanda isn’t in fact, Chinese Kung Fu at all.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |